Is Himalayan Rock Salt better than Celtic Sea Salt?

Go to the internet or your local health shop and ask about good natural salt and you will be flooded with talk touting the great virtues of Himalayan Salt. We are told that Himalayan salt is mined from pure unpolluted mountains of Himalaya from deposits laid down eons ago so it has the most good minerals and least bad ones such as heavy metals. Well what are the facts? I decided to check it out myself. First, going back to basics, all minerals are eventually washed into the sea. So were is the highest concentration of minerals going to be? In the sea. It follows that correctly harvested sea salt will logically have the most minerals. Is this so? I wanted to know for myself using science and simple observation so I could determine which salt I would use, advocate and sell and cut through the adverting hype.  At Alnatural Health we are very particular about what we sell. I did a comparison of Celtic Sea Salt and Himalayan Salt by obtaining the official chemical analysis of both Celtic Sea Salt (1) and Himalayan Salt (2) from major supplies of both. Both analyses were done by independent labs.  Let’s look at the results:

Comparison of Celtic Sea Salt to Himalayan Salt

Mineral

Celtic Gray salt

Himalayan Salt

% Difference (Himalayan – Celtic)

%

%

%

Sodium

31.42

38.26

21.77

Magnesium

3.12

1.6

-48.72

Aluminum

<0.05

0.0000661

Silicon

0.27

0.01

-96.3

Phosphorous

<0.0395

<0.01

Sulfur

1.17

1.24

5.98

Chloride

62.89

59.1

-6.03

Potassium

0.64

0.35

-45.31

Calcium

0.41

0.4

-2.44

Scandium

<0.005

0.00000001

Titanium

<0.0015

0.00011

Vanadium

<0.0006

0.000006

Chromium

<0.0004

0.000005

Manganese

<0.0003

0.000027

Iron

0.0284

0.00389

-86.3

Cobalt

<0.0002

0.00006

Nickel

<0.0001

0.000013

Copper

<0.0001

0.000056

Zinc

<0.0001

0.000238

Gallium

<0.0001

0.0000001

Germanium

<0.0001

0.0000001

Arsenic

<0.0001

<0.000001

Selenium

<0.0002

0.000005

Bromine

0.0403

0.00021

-99.48

Rubidium

<0.0007

0.000004

Strontium

0.005

0.0014

-72.00

Yttrium

<0.0004

0.0000001

Zirconium

<0.0007

0.0000001

Niobium

<0.0006

0.0000001

Molybdenum

<0.0007

0.000001

Technetium

<0.0009

Note 1

Ruthenium

<0.0013

not listed

Rhodium

<0.0016

0.0000001

Palladium

<0.0019

0.0000001

Silver

<0.0025

0.0000031

Cadmium

<0.0035

<0.000001

Indium

<0.0044

<0.0000001

Tin

<0.0059

<0.000001

Antimony

<0.0074

<0.000001

Tellurium

<0.0537

not listed

Iodine

<0.0002

<0.01

Cesium

<0.0059

<0.0000001

Barium

<0.0048

0.000196

Lanthanum

<0.0034

<0.0000001

Cerium

<0.0023

<0.0000001

Praseodymium

<0.0017

<0.0000001

Neodymium

<0.0014

<0.0000001

Promethium

<0.0011

Note1

Samarium

<0.0010

<0.0000001

Europium

<0.0009

<0.0003

Gadolinium

<0.0007

<0.0000001

Terbium

<0.0013

<0.0000001

Dysprosium

<0.0015

<0.0004

Holmium

<0.0006

<0.0000001

Erbium

<0.0007

<0.0000001

Thulium

<0.0006

<0.0000001

Ytterbium

<0.0005

<0.0000001

Lutetium

<0.0005

<0.0000001

Hafnium

<0.0004

<0.0000001

Tantalum

<0.0004

Not  listed

Tungsten

<0.0004

Not  listed

Rhenium

<0.0004

<0.00025

Osmium

<0.0004

<0.0000001

Iridium

<0.0003

<0.0002

Platinum

<0.0004

0.000047

Gold

<0.0004

<0.0001

Mercury

<0.0004

0.000003

Thallium

<0.0004

0.000006

Lead

<0.0004

0.00001

Bismuth

<0.0004

0.00001

Thorium

<0.0007

0.0000001

Uranium

<0.0009

0.0000001

Note 1: Himalayan salt analysis states this element is an artificial isotope so is not included (2). It is the only element without a stable isotope. The Celtic salt analysis includes it. These isotopes exist everywhere, but notice the amount is negligible.  

Notice that Sodium is significantly higher in Himalayan Salt than Celtic Salt, others, especially Magnesium, which is about half that of  Himalayan Salt, are lower. The first thing that hits you is Himalayan Salt is lower than  Celtic Sea Salt in most everything except for Sodium, almost 22% more sodium. All other minerals, except the acidifying element, Sulfur (about 6% more) are lower. Higher Sulfur content would be expected where there is volcanic action in the past. Celtic Sea Salt retains all the minerals in sea water and sea water contains the concentration of minerals washed down for over 4000 yrs. Himalayan salt contains the minerals that were in it when it was laid down reflecting what minerals were washed down from the soil  and deposited  at the time of formation. Himalayan Salt is lower in Magnesium. Remember that Magnesium is the essential mineral that is deficient in so most people. Sodium is interesting.  It seems that the concentration of a higher percentage of other minerals in the sea, particularly Chloride and Magnesium, has diluted the sodium. I noticed that when I tried Himalayan salt that it is more salty to taste than  Celtic Sea Salt, more like refined salt.

What about heavy metals?  Himalayan salt looks like it has lower levels of heavy metals than CelticSea salt. This is to be expected because almost every other element in  Celtic Sea Salt is higher than Himalayan salt. That appears to be plus for Himalayan salt, however some figures are expressed as less than (<) it is hard to compare them, e.g. Mercury is given as <0.0004% for Celtic Salt, and 0.0000001% for Himalayan Salt. You just cannot compare such figures. Microbes in sea  Anyway the levels are so low they would be comparable with much of the food you eat. The lab that did the Celtic Salt analysis made the following comment:

Arsenic, Cadmium, Lead, Nickel and Mercury  Our laboratory also tests for these elements that are sometimes referred to as “heavy metals” and that are present in many things we come into contact with every day in our environment. The Codex Alimentarius Commission — formed by the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) and the WHO (World Health Organization) — has established the maximum safe levels acceptable in food grade salt for some of these elements. In our most recent analysis all these elements were either non detectable (Arsenic, Cadmium, Mercury) or were well under the published safe limits specified by Codex (Lead – present at levels no higher than .000076% while the Codex limit is .000200%). There are no limits specified for Nickel (present at levels no higher than .000004%).”  (2)

What about pollutants in the sea? The action of waves in oxygenating sea water and the action of sunlight and marine microorganisms in the sea are known to purify the oceans by braking down pollutants put into them. Methyl Mercury is degraded by microbes in sea water (3) The ocean is a fantastic purifier, otherwise the ocean would not sustain life anymore. There is something/s in sea water that have not yet been discovered.  When scientists put fish in a sea water tank they were fine. When put in water that had been made to copy sea water, combining all the known components of sea water they died. Looking at the ocean currents that bring sea water to the north coast of France where Celtic Sea Salt is harvested on the ocean map shown at http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/8q_1.html I find that the water arriving at Celtic Sea Salt’s harvest point on the coast of France travels right across the Atlantic Ocean, in the Nth Atlantic drift. It does not touch land across in it’s trip across the entire Atlantic ocean. Thousands of Km are traveled, plenty of time and contact with purifying elements elapses before arriving on the coast of France to be harvested.  Note also, looking at the map, the Atlantic has to be cleanest  ocean when you  compare it to the Pacific for instance. The proof is that it Celtic Sea Salt has to pass rigid organic standards of the European and Australian Certification for purity. Notice, the water does not come from the polluted coasts of Europe or England as has been suggested by Celtic Sea Salt’s opponents. It is totally false. When we look at the facts free from advertising hype which does not hold water, we see that we cannot go past the good old, tried and true Celtic Sea Salt:

  •  Mineral content is better, and more balanced, with about double the magnesium and 1/5 the sodium,
  •  The kind of  mercury Celtic Salt contains actually helps us to deal with toxic heavy metals, including methyl mercury,
  • It does not contain pollutants washed down from our civilizations on land.
  • There is something/s in sea water that have not yet been discovered.  When scientists put fish in a sea water tank they were fine. When put in water that had been made to copy sea water, combining all the known components of sea water they died.

Finally, as with everything that is new, Himalayan salt is several times more expensive to buy that  Celtic Salt and, in my opinion Celtic salt is tastes nicer. I know what I am going to use and advocate.

References:

1. http://www.selinanaturally.com/content/PDF/css_analysis.pdf  

2. http://www.safesalt.com.au/analysis.html 

3.  http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.395/abstract;jsessionid=A2DFB1EBB34CF2D3DBBF8BEFD97FB252.f03t03

 

14 comments on “Is Himalayan Rock Salt better than Celtic Sea Salt?

  1. Great article, great research, thanks for sharing this very unbiased report. I appreciate your effort and will share the information with others

  2. Denice on said:

    Good article and thanks. Have been reading lately about fluoride and Himalayan salt. Some people won’t use it because of it’s fluoride content. do you know if it has been analysed for fluoride?

  3. Hi there, I enjoy reading all of your article. I wanted to write
    a little comment to support you.

  4. Excellent website you have here but I was curious if you knew of any user discussion forums that cover the same topics discussed in this
    article? I’d really love to be a part of online community where I can get suggestions from other experienced individuals that share the same interest. If you have any suggestions, please let me know. Many thanks!

  5. Very nice blog post. I absolutely love this site. Thanks!

  6. I must thank you for the efforts you’ve put in penning this site. I really hope to see the same high-grade content by you in the future as well. In fact, your creative writing abilities has encouraged me to get my own, personal site now ;)

  7. Hey there! This is my first visit to your blog!
    We are a group of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche.
    Your blog provided us beneficial information to work
    on. You have done a extraordinary job!

  8. Can I just say what a comfort to uncover somebody that genuinely knows what they are talking about on the net.
    You certainly know how to bring an issue to light and make it important.
    More and more people have to check this out and
    understand this side of your story. I can’t believe you’re not more popular because you certainly have the gift.

  9. That is very attention-grabbing, You’re an overly professional blogger.
    I have joined your rss feed and stay up for looking for more of your excellent post.
    Also, I have shared your web site in my social networks

  10. Wow, awesome weblog layout! How long have you been running
    a blog for? you made blogging look easy. The total glance of your website is fantastic, as smartly as the content!

  11. We stumbled over here by a different web address and thought I should check things out.
    I like what I see so i am just following you. Look forward to looking at your web page for a second time.

  12. Pingback: Minerals and bones, calcium and heart attacks | healthfully

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

11,736 Spam Comments Blocked so far by Spam Free Wordpress

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <p> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>